experience of using FaceUp
Whistleblowing
Corporate culture

What is our clients’ experience of using FaceUp?

We love hearing from our clients about how the introduction of FaceUp has worked well and how it’s helping them improve their company culture. We are often asked how FaceUp works in practice, so we’ve asked some of our clients about their specific experiences. SPORTISIMOSport equipment retailer SPORTISIMO has more than 200 stores across 5 countries and employs over 4000 people. The company’s management assumed that they wouldn't receive especially serious reports. After a year of using our platform, the reality is that their reports don’t reference fraud or serious problems, but instead contain suggestions or requests which have proven to be worth addressing: “For example, someone asked if we might be able to change the music that plays in our stores more frequently. Another employee asked why we don’t have a women’s version of a popular type of men’s size 42 shoes. At first glance, they may appear to be rather mundane issues which management don’t see due to their professional blindness, but addressing these things leads to a happier workforce,” explains Thomas Rodny. SPORTISIMO receives an average of 15 reports per month and many of them are ideas of how to improve things from employees who are too shy to speak up in person.   Brno-Centre Municipal OfficeThe introduction of FaceUp was also extremely important for the Brno-Centre Municipal Office. Their management were concerned that the option to send reports anonymously would result in slander. However, this didn’t materialise. Thanks to FaceUp, their management learnt of a case of long-term bullying in the workplace and were able to successfully resolve the issue.  A slightly unexpected albeit useful dimension that FaceUp gave us was in the area of labour relations. We received several anonymous reports from employees about bullying. After an investigation, we terminated our working relationship with one of the heads of a large department of the Brno-Centre Municipal Office and in another case we placed several employees under different leadership. This then led to increased overall productivity in this office,” describes Petr Stika, secretary at the Brno-Centre Municipal Office.  ADvTechADvTECH is South Africa’s largest private education provider. All of ADvTECH’s 7 580 staff members, teachers, lecturers and students between Grades 4 and 12 at its 96 schools throughout South Africa has access to the app. "Using FaceUp, reports that have come through have been resolved far more efficiently than any other platform or method we have used in the past. Another advantage is that reporters can track what is happening with their report and the status of any investigations that are taking place. Our experience has been excellent, " says Vanessa Crawford, HR Manager at ADvTech. AKKAIndustrial company AKKA produces tools, systems and components for the automobile, railway and aviation industries. They decided to implement FaceUp to be able to communicate better with their employees and get feedback from them: “It was about connecting management with workers. We used to hold regular meetings, but no one raised anything. Now, before each event we invite employees to use FaceUp to tell us what’s on their mind. People really do send in questions which gives us a point of discussion for the meetings.” Vitkovice Steel Vitkovice Steel is a steel company which operates out of the Vitkovice ironworks in Ostrava and employs 900 people. After introducing a whistleblowing platform, their employees started sending around 5-7 reports a month. The reports were mainly generic queries or people seeking reassurance. For example, employees checked if they had correctly understood management communications.  FaceUp is helping to improve their company culture - just after they introduced the platform, 70% of people wrote reports anonymously, now that’s down to just 30%. Employees have understood that they really can ask anything and are no longer scared to write under their own name.  What are companies generally facing? According to our clients, these are the issues most commonly shared by their employees through FaceUp in recent years: When war broke out in Ukraine, many employees started to worry for the future of the company and their own work position. When companies go through a restructuring (for example, after an acquisition), employees asked about new processes, flagged points of confusion, and expressed their concerns for the future. The Covid-19 pandemic brought with it a wide range of measures and regulations which companies had to communicate to their employees. Employees then asked about regulations details or checked if they had understood the information correctly.  Do you need advice on how to effectively introduce a whistleblowing platform? 
2022-07-25T10:01:07.045Z4 min read
Brno-střed
Whistleblowing

"After investigating several reports through FaceUp we terminated our working relationship with a head of department,” reveals secretary of the Brno-Centre Municipal Office

What did the introduction of FaceUp to the Brno-Centre Municipal Office bring? And why has there been an increase in overall productivity across the workplace? Read our interview with the secretary of the Brno-Centre Municipal Office, Bc. Petr Štika, MBA, LL.M. First you introduced an anti-corruption hotline and then subsequently were the first authority in the Czech Republic to introduce an online whistleblowing platform. What motivated you to introduce these channels? "We started using an anonymous whistleblowing channel several years ago because we wanted to increase the city hall’s transparency and introduce an effective tool to prevent corruption. We wanted to give everyone who has been in contact with the office or the organisations of our city district and has witnessed corruption or unethical conduct to be able to report it. We imagined that the option of anonymous reporting would be used by goods or service suppliers who had been unsuccessful and maybe the employees of entrepreneurs who have worked with our city district. We assumed that these target groups in particular would be fearful of reporting suspicious activities that they might have witnessed.” Why did you switch from an anti-corruption hotline to a whistleblowing platform and what do you see as the differences between the two?“A fundamental and significant difference between the two is that when a whistleblower submits a report through a whistleblowing platform you can keep communicating with them, provide feedback, and clarify their report. When reporting through a whistleblowing platform a whistleblower can stay anonymous, the system generates a numerical code with which they can log into their report, receive feedback, add to their report, and maintain contact with the recipient of the report.” How has the introduction of this channel gone for you? What has it improved?“The introduction of an anonymous whistleblowing channel has worked out really well for us. Originally we only thought of it as a tool for preventing corrupt conduct. Nevertheless, whistleblowers do use the tool. We have already received several dozen reports through it. At the beginning we were a little concerned from an ethical standpoint that the ability to send anonymous reports through the channel would result in slander and abuse. But this did not materialise. The reports that we have received so far have been relatively factual and concrete. We were able to investigate them and come to objective conclusions. Thanks to these reports we have also taken a range of other measures. From this perspective, it is an excellent tool for improvement. However, we are prepared for slanderous reports, that is whose goal is not to draw attention to breaches of the law but to unfairly damage someone’s name through the whistleblower’s actions. From my many years of experience in leadership positions I know that the only way to effectively combat slander is to fully investigate, and if the claim is false, fully refute it. That way you clear the person’s name who the slander was aimed at and you maintain good internal culture within your organisation. This is why an anonymous channel is suitable.  After investigating several reports we terminated our working relationship with the head of a large department of the Brno-Centre Municipal Office. What is interesting is that overall productivity then increased in this workplace.  A slightly unexpected albeit useful dimension that we have obtained from the anonymous whistleblowing channel is in the area of labour relations. We received several anonymous reports from employees about bullying. We took this very seriously, as our work environment is very important to us. After their investigation, we terminated our working relationship with one of the heads of a large department of the Brno-Centre Municipal Office and in another case we placed several employees under different leadership. Thanks to this anonymous whistleblowing channel we were able to create better working conditions for our employees. What was interesting is that overall productivity then increased in this workplace.”
2022-06-08T08:13:33.000Z3 min read
DSC07679_1.jpg
Whistleblowing
Corporate culture

Thanks to FaceUp, our employees send us 15 relevant suggestions each month, enthuses SPORTISIMO HR Director.

Sports equipment retailer SPORTISIMO has more than 200 stores in 5 countries and employs more than 4,000 people. In order for employees to be able to anonymously send in suggestions of how they might improve the way the company runs, they introduced the online tool FaceUp at the beginning of 2021. Company HR Director Tomáš Rodný is delighted with that decision.  Extremely useful, albeit less serious, reportsFaceUp is an online platform created especially for the anonymous reporting of unfair or illegal conduct within companies (also known as ‘whistleblowing’). However, employees can also use the tool to make less serious suggestions to help improve the company, which happens very often in practice.  “SPORTISIMO is open to employee feedback, which is why we carry out a survey each month, asking staff about a predetermined issue. We introduced FaceUp as more of a complementary tool, a hotline through which people can anonymously raise a given matter. To be truthful, we only expected to receive a small number of reports, for example about serious breaches of internal regulations or even law breaking,” recalls Tomáš Rodný. However the reality was quite the opposite. During a year of operation, SPORTISIMO employees submitted over 180 reports. That’s an average of 15 per month. The majority of these reports were in fact not about serious matters, but more everyday issues. But they were still extremely valuable.  “For example, one person suggested that we change the music in our stores more often. Another employee asked why we don’t have a women’s version of a popular men’s size 42 shoe. At first glance they might be dismissed as trivial, things which management is blind to, but it’s worth dealing with them as it leads to higher employee satisfaction,” continues Tomáš Rodný. Initial fears of misuse of the tool quickly disappearedFaceUp is particularly praised for the simplicity of its implementation and use. “FaceUp has made our work a lot easier. The application interface and all materials are translated into five languages and they have even prepared marketing materials such as flyers. As a result, we’ve been able to introduce FaceUp into all our stores in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania, Bulgaria and Hungary,” added Rodný, who has worked for SPORTISIMO for five years. FaceUp is a simple online whistleblowing platform, which an employee can learn to use within a couple of minutes. Initial fears that FaceUp wouldn’t be used or that employees would abuse it by overwhelming it with nonsense reports proved to be unfounded. “It didn’t happen even once. The overwhelming majority of reports are really relevant, they quickly reach the appropriate person and in turn we resolve the matter. Through FaceUp you can communicate further with the person who sent the report, albeit anonymously, should you need further details or clarification. More straightforward issues we’re able to deal with in 24 hours, the more complex ones within a week or two. Most conversations end with the author of the report thanking us for dealing with the issue,” reveals Tomáš Rodný. Tomáš Rodný has no doubt that he would recommend FaceUp to other companies: "I absolutely recommend FaceUp to any company which, like us, has a number of branches over a large area, for instance over several countries. In such an environment it can be difficult to systematically collect feedback from employees, but thanks to this anonymous platform, it is possible,” he concludes. 
2022-05-02T20:36:11.428Z3 min read
Onlooker efect
Uncategorized
Whistleblowing

The onlooker effect and other reasons people don’t report unethical conduct

More than half of a company’s employees who witness unethical or illegal conduct hide it from their superiors. However, nearly 75% admit that they would share information regarding fraud with an external party such as the media, the police, or a lawyer. As an example, this exactly what happened to Škoda Auto when in 2019 a severe case of workplace bullying came to light. The media heard of stories of regular employees locking their agency colleagues in crates and putting laxatives in their coffee. In the best case scenario, unreported problems can result in a media scandal, in the worst case they end up in court.  The start of whistleblowing in the EUA fundamental change in the area of whistleblowing in the EU is being brought about by EU directive EU 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law. In relation to the directive becoming law, all private companies with more than 50 employees must implement internal reporting channels for the reporting of inappropriate behaviour or fraud by the 31st March 2022. The rules are quite strict - the whistleblower must be able to report their issue anonymously, their safety must be ensured, and the company must respond to the complaint within the designated time frame. Why are people reluctant to report unethical conduct?The onlooker effectVery often we see the presence of the so-called ‘onlooker effect’. In such cases, the employee doesn’t report anything because they assume somebody else will. The onlooker effect is a paradoxical psychological phenomenon which shows that the more people present at a dangerous or hostile situation, the less likely someone is to intervene.  In 1960, psychologists Bibb Latané and Judith Rodin carried out an experiment. Columbia University students were invited to a room where they were to fill in a questionnaire in the presence of an assistant. After a while, the assistant announced that she would be right back and went into the next room. After four minutes, she played a recording of a fictional fall, where she moans that she has broken her ankle. The recording was set to play until one of the subjects came to help her or until a minute passed. How did it turn out? 70% of the students rushed to the assistant’s aid if they were alone in the roomIf there were two students in the room, 40% decided to helpAs the number of participants increased (including people who agreed to passively participate in the experiment) those who chose to help fell to an unbelievable 7%The results of similar experiments show that people respond to emergency situations more slowly in the presence of others. No single person feels responsible for dealing with the crisis situation.  FearBesides the fact that people who report unethical activities in the workplace are often labelled snitches, they face the threat of retaliation on the part of colleagues or their superiors. People have to face the internal fear of rejection and also that of losing their job, ostracisation by their colleagues and other consequences.  The absence of a secure reporting systemThe reluctance of employees to report unethical or fraudulent activities in their company is due, among other things, to the lack of a reporting system which would allow them to simply and safely report such behaviour. Telephone hotlines, emails and physical boxes are a thing of the past and, what’s more, they don’t guarantee 100% safety and anonymity which is key in such cases.  How to effectively introduce a whistleblowing platform into your company?All of these barriers can be reduced through the introduction of a company reporting tool. The basis is transparent communication with employees. Those in management positions need to clearly explain why they are introducing a reporting system into the company, what they expect in relation to it, and, above all, how people should use it.  Do you have questions about how to implement a company reporting tool? Would you like to see FaceUp in action? Book a no obligation consultation with one of our specialists. 
2022-03-29T18:46:38.105Z3 min read
Protecting whistleblowers pays off handsomely for companies
Whistleblowing

5 reasons why it pays off to introduce a whistleblowing system

Whistleblowing is most often associated with the fight against corruption, but there is much more to it. It helps companies establish a healthy and ethical environment, gain an edge over competitors, and protect themselves against reputational damage. Whistleblowing also has significant societal benefits, protects the public interest, and has prevented a number of unpleasant situations in recent years. Let's take a look at the top five reasons why it's worth your while to implement a whistleblowing system.  1. Protect your company's reputation Unless employees have a tool that allows them to easily, safely, and anonymously raise concerns about unfair or illegal conduct, they will usually keep quiet about such issues or go public with the information, no matter how serious. While financial losses can be made up, damage to a company's reputation can be irreversible. And yet, most problems can be easily resolved through a reporting channel, meaning that management becomes aware of it in good time. A whistleblowing platform helps prevent a media storm and poor reviews on a company review portal.   2. Save money According to research by NAVEX Global, companies lose an average of 5% of their revenue due to internal fraud. A properly implemented whistleblowing platform will uncover 3x more fraud than much more costly internal audits and is one of the most effective tools for detecting unfair practice.  The benefit of a whistleblowing system is that you can learn of problems ahead of time, so that you can resolve them without paying out huge sums and avoid further financial damages. In addition, the very introduction of a whistleblowing system acts as a preventive measure. The fact that there is such a system in place in a company can deter some people from acting illegally or unfairly in the first place. 3. Reduce employee turnover Most people who decide to change jobs have a compelling reason to do so. Surprisingly, the most common reason is not the amount of financial compensation, but dissatisfaction with the atmosphere in the workplace. Whether it's the attitude of management, relationships between colleagues or other related issues, detecting them early can prevent employees from leaving. If you have a well-established whistleblowing platform, you send a strong signal that you care about employee satisfaction. They can raise their concerns with a view to having them alleviated before they decide definitively to leave their role.  4. Avoid criminal liabilityIn many countries, a properly implemented and functioning whistleblowing system helps a company to satisfy the conditions necessary to escape corporate criminal liability. Moreover, with an effective whistleblowing system, a company can obtain a range of certifications, from ISO to CSR, and it also increases its credibility in the eyes of stakeholders and international business partners. 5. Ensures EU companies meet their legal obligationsThe European Whistleblowing Directive came into force on 17 December 2021 and as such, EU companies with more than 50 employees must do the following: introduce appropriate internal and external whistleblowing channelsdesignate a person or persons to receive and assess whistleblowing,allow suppliers, candidates for employment in the company, freelancers and other similar persons who might not be deemed ‘workers’ but who may find themselves in a position of economic vulnerability in the context of their work-related activities to also submit whistleblowing reports and for the whistleblower to be notified in writing within 7 days of receipt.assess the notification and notify the reporting person of the outcome in writing within 30 days (2 extensions possible)prevent possible retaliation against whistleblowers and accept anonymous notifications.It should also be taken into account that a whistleblowing platform cannot be implemented overnight. It will take time to establish a functional and credible whistleblowing platform, train staff, and ensure that there is sufficient awareness of its existence.  Do you have any questions? Would you like to see FaceUp in action? Schedule a no-obligation consultation with one of our specialists. 
2022-03-29T17:56:46.312Z3 min read
Whistleblowing system
Whistleblowing

Protecting whistleblowers pays off handsomely for companies

According to the EU Whistleblowing Directive, all companies in the EU with more than 50 employees must introduce an internal reporting channel to provide protection for whistleblowers. Whistleblowers will be able to share their suspicions of corruption and other similar risks that they have encountered through their work activities with an authorised individual.  The EU Whistleblowing Directive sets out rules and procedures to protect whistleblowers, i.e. employees who report information pertaining to breaches of EU law obtained in a work-related context. The directive covers a range of potential rule breaches, various people working in both the private and public sector, and complements existing EU whistleblowing legislation.  “Whistleblowing is a relatively new concept for many European companies, yet in the West it’s considered to be one of the most effective ways that companies can protect their reputations, employees, assets, and company culture.” According to last year’s global study by ACFE, as much as 43% of fraud detection originates in reporting, which is three times more than in internal auditing. This not insignificant figure is compounded by the fact that the average European firm loses 5% of its annual revenue due to internal fraud.  Whistleblowing as preventionBesides the detection of fraud, a properly set up whistleblowing system helps to establish a positive company culture, fosters trust in the organisation, builds employee loyalty, and protects the company’s reputation. Last but not least, the existence of such a system can have a preventative effect.  Whistleblowing doesn’t just have to be a means of reporting misconduct. More and more companies treat it as a benefit for employees who can safely and anonymously flag anything that is difficult to raise in person. This embeds a culture of openness and, more significantly, reduces employee turnover. There is a good reason why it is said that all the free company breakfasts in the world can’t compare with the message a company’s management sends its employees.  The imperative of listening to employees is underlined by other studies which say that:43% of employees are unhappy or demotivated at workOne in five leave due to better and fairer treatmentIn addition, 23% of employees have experienced bullying in the workplace and 38% of women have been sexually harassed.All of these problems could be avoided if a company’s management sent a clear signal to their employees that their views and concerns mattered and could be shared without fear of the consequences. Even if there is a culture of openness within a company, there are still issues which are difficult to talk about in person.  Suggestion boxes and telephone hotlines no longer cut itUntil recently some companies used a physical trust box or a telephone hotline for whistleblowing. However, such tools attract criticism not just because employees are embarrassed to use them but because they don’t fulfill the requirements set out by the new directive. Therefore, more and more companies are turning to modern online solutions such as the FaceUp platform (FaceUp.com) which offers whistleblowers anonymity and allows for further communication by chat where any enquiries can be made and all complaints can be resolved.  It is precisely this type of reporting channel which sets apart the companies who want to meet their employees’ needs and treat the law as an opportunity. Their employees will then back this up. There is a big difference between companies who only pay lip service to whistleblowing and those who introduce a secure, user-friendly platform which sends a clear signal to their employees that they can raise concerns without fear.  We would be happy to answer all of your questions about whistleblowing. Let's talk. 
2022-03-29T16:07:05.384Z3 min read
Competent authority
Whistleblowing

External vs. internal competent authority managing whistleblower reports

A trustee, ombudsman or delegated person. All of these terms you may encounter refer to one and the same thing, namely the so-called "competent authority", who is a key function in the internal whistleblowing system. Companies implementing a whistleblowing system are therefore faced with the important question of who to assign to this function. In the following, we look at what responsibilities are associated with the function, how to select the right person and whether it is more appropriate to choose an internal employee or an external delegate for this role. Who is the competent authority and what are his/her duties?One of the main duties associated with the forthcoming Whistleblower Protection Act is the appointment of a 'competent authority' who: receives and assesses the reasonableness of a notification made through the internal whistleblowing system,proposes corrective measures following a notification,maintains confidentiality; andacts impartially.The person who receives and deals with the notification must be of good repute, of the utmost trustworthiness, independent, free from conflicts of interest and properly trained. It is extremely important to keep the whistleblowing system as credible and efficient as possible through a sufficiently knowledgeable competent authority, thus avoiding the risk of the whistleblower disclosing information. A whistleblower may disclose information when they do not have sufficient confidence in the whistleblowing system or when they feel that the firm is not adequately handling the disclosure (they may get this feeling from a mere lack of communication). What are the steps to be taken by the competent authority once a notification has been made?The competent authority is obliged to receive the oral or written notification via the internal notification system. If the whistleblower requests it, the competent authority is also obliged to receive the notification in person.The competent authority must notify the notifier in writing of the receipt of the notification within seven days of the date of receipt.The competent authority shall assess the validity of the notification and inform the notifier in writing of the results of the assessment within thirty days of receipt of the notification. (In complex cases, this period may be extended by up to thirty days, but not more than twice.)If the notification is assessed as substantiated, the competent authority shall propose measures to prevent or remedy the unlawful situation and shall inform the notifier in writing.If the notification is not found to be justified, the competent authority shall inform the notifier in writing.Is an internal employee the appropriate person to receive and evaluate the notification?The head of the legal department, the compliance officer or someone from the human resources department are usually suggested as the appropriate person. However, this is a rather demanding and very responsible position which involves a large number of responsibilities. In addition, the person chosen must be sufficiently independent to avoid a conflict of interest in the investment of the notification. Last but not least, they must reliably maintain confidentiality, prevent anyone from having access to the content of the notification and must not provide anyone with any information that could defeat the purpose of the notification. A violation of these duties of the competent authority is punishable by a fine. If the company does not have a suitable candidate to perform this function, it is possible to appoint an external person who guarantees independence and professionalism in dealing with the notification and proposing effective measures.  See a comparison of the benefits of an external and internal competent authorityExternal competent authority: less administrative burden for the companythe investigation is guaranteed to be objectiveno risk of conflict of interestnotifications are better evaluated by a professional with experience in receiving and dealing with notificationslower risk of disclosure of the identity of the whistleblowerInternal competent authority:  better knowledge of the company and internal processeslower financial costseasier accessibility for verbal notificationsWho receives and evaluates the notification can be quite crucial to the fate of the entire incident. Failure to properly carry out the duties of the person in charge jeopardises the credibility and functionality of the entire notification system. The company is then at risk that the employee will either not file a report at all and the problems will accumulate, or will disclose their information, causing the company to lose control of the situation, but more importantly, the company may suffer devastating reputational or financial damage.
2022-03-21T10:07:30.343Z4 min read
ISO 37002.png
Legal
Whistleblowing

Whistleblowing guidelines: what you need to know about ISO 37002

At the end of July 2021, the International Organisation for Standardisation published ISO 37002:2021 (ISO 37002 Whistleblowing management systems - Guidelines). This standard is a guide for the effective implementation of an internal whistleblowing and  management system related to this. Together with previously published standards (in particular ISO 37302), it forms the first global standard to fully address whistleblowing. The new ISO 37002 provides guidance for establishing and maintaining an effective whistleblowing system based on the principles of trust, impartiality and protection. The standard can therefore prove to be a very useful guide for employers in establishing and using internal whistleblowing systems in accordance with legislative requirements (the EU Whistleblowing Directive and the forthcoming Czech Whistleblower Protection Act). However, unlike the legislation, it does not focus so much on whistleblowers, but targets organisations directly. It seeks to minimise the negative impact of any possible wrongdoing. According to ISO 37002, the important elements are: information securityensuring an anonymous dialogue with the whistleblowerprotection of whistleblowers The FaceUp platform is fully compliant with all current legislative requirements and the recommendations of the new ISO 37002 standard. What can ISO 37002 help you with?While the legislative requirements generally tell you what you need to do, ISO 37002 provides very specific and detailed instructions on how to do it. The standard can be implemented in any private, public or not-for-profit organisation, regardless of size or business sector. It is a broadly applicable standard - it emphasises consideration of the context, needs and expectations of the organisation and adapts the whistleblowing management system to these actualities.  According to ISO 37002, you should devote plentyt of time and attention to the  preparation and planning of an internal whistleblowing system, from securing all resources, allocating responsibilities, determining how to communicate through an ethical line or other whistleblowing channel, to documentation, etc. The standard sets out the content of the obligations for employers, defining individual roles, responsibilities and authorities. A substantial part of the standard is devoted to the actual process of managing the whistleblowing notifications received, which is naturally the most important part of the whole whistleblowing management system. On the other hand, the standard also emphasises the importance of other consecutive follow-up  (e.g. planning or subsequent evaluation of the effectiveness of the system).  The whole whistleblowing management process is divided into several key steps: Receipt of the notification of the violation,Assessment of the notification ,Management of  the whistleblowing - this  also includes providing protection and support to whistleblowers,Closing the case.According to ISO 37002, it is also necessary to focus on assessing the effectiveness of the internal whistleblowing system and to address its monitoring, analysis and subsequent evaluation. The recommendation is to conduct regular internal audits, the findings of which should help improve the whistleblowing management system. At the same time, it foresees that the system can be adapted at any time during its use to better suit the needs of your organisation and to be truly effective. Certification options and other standards for compliance management systemsAs stated directly in the title of the new ISO standard (Whistleblowing management systems - Guidelines), it is one of the so-called guidelines, i.e. standards of a more general nature, and therefore cannot be certified. However, you can certify your internal whistleblowing channel as part of a complete compliance management system according to ISO 37301 Compliance management systems - Requirements with guidance for use. In the context of whistleblowing, the (also certifiable) ISO 37001 Anti-bribery management systems standard, which deals with the protection against corrupt behaviour and establishes anti-corruption management systems, is also frequently referred to. Implementing these standards will ensure that your organisation's internal whistleblowing channel is truly effective and in line with all international standards. Interested in implementing ISO 37002 or any of the other ISO standards listed? We would be happy to explain the specific requirements and help you with the certification process. Let's talk. 
2022-03-21T09:40:05.238Z3 min read
1
2
3

New e-book about whistleblowingDownload our free e-book

Whistleblowing - just a bureaucracy or an opportunity for your company?

E-book illustration

Download the e-book in PDF

Your full name
Your email
Your organisation

By clicking Download PDF, you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Secure and easy to use whistleblowing solution

Try FaceUp - A customisable reporting platform that's trusted by 2,165 companies and schools worldwide.

Group 718.png
REGISTER FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

FaceUp Technology © 2022

The complete guide to corporate whistleblowing

Your full name
Your phone number
Your organisation
Your email

By clicking Download the e-book for free, you agree to our Privacy Policy.